Count
were
half time. If this ruling to be applied in the Horspool's the Zürt Part it would have to be modified was to apply onlypts of 1881, (when the
Special Police rûlé
In that case
Sept
was promulgated), misteow if the
unstea 2nd 11.8056. his half has leave
together with atim leave (which
vacation
A
Sep
was inadvertenth granted to him from 1867 to Sof Contrasz. & the Police rules) woul fall well within the limit of me Gron Servies sixth of resident service (see margin), Leave and would consequently be allowed to count in fall
But I have great doubt whether zon would have passed the draft
19748/57, if zu
had realized
that any part of Mr. Haspool's
1437.
5u
13r. Su
Resident service
13zr.
At that tim we supposed
Lewe (ir any police officer's ) leave une f indeed would count in full. I certainly till 15910/887
did not contemplate this when writing the minutes or draft on that paper, but
my
intention war &
propose that all half pay leave in
Police officer's
camt
service Shuld
half time; and I do not
think it would be unfair BHd Horsfort
to so
s to decline to allow his early leave,
M
to count in full.
It is true that box when he took leave
in 1878-9
he
was
probably under the
inpression that it would count
as well
A
a full (depending
arrived) that Servan no Civil dewan would count-
s his
Anz
leave in full,
in consequen
of the desp. uvitte in 1806, withdran Led (annarni. 1876 promise.
ld count infolk leave, as full time she someinen
m
ar
In other
1876 promise) but hand when he took leave in 1885- he expected that it would not count.
at all according to thee 1881 Police Rule (which has been applied in Several pensin cases) – so
that
were now decided that all
leave should count as
a
would not have real
Complain.
A
if it
lin
377
halftime he
ground t
Howerw I sulmit draft accordingly first
part of Jams in
wenda dam in consideratts doubt to what is the best course all the circumstances.
as
J. W. 9.29 Mary
T'have proper the dust. Rm 29/5
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.